Categorical μὴ κατὰ χρόνον propositions in Alexander of Aphrodisias’ modal syllogistic
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s theory of the Stoic indemonstrables
In her important 1979 paper “Aristoteles über Syllogismen ‘aufgrund einer Hypothese’”, 1 Gisela Striker provided an in-depth analysis of these vexing and perplexing Aristotelian arguments. She showed that they were Aristotle’s way of providing a logical vehicle for inferences based on other than term-logical relations; that the ‘hypothesis’ that gives them their name is best understood as a rul...
متن کاملA Reconstruction of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic
Ever since Łukasiewicz, it has been opinio communis that Aristotle’s modal syllogistic is incomprehensible due to its many faults and inconsistencies, and that there is no hope of finding a single consistent formal model for it. The aim of this paper is to disprove these claims by giving such a model. My main points shall be, first, that Aristotle’s syllogistic is a pure term logic that does no...
متن کاملPr ecis of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic
Aristotle was the founder of modal logic. In his Prior Analytics, he developed a complex system of modal syllogistic. While influential, this system has been disputed since antiquity and is today widely regarded as incoherent or inconsistent. In view of this, Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic explores the prospects for understanding the modal syllogistic as a coherent and consistent system of modal...
متن کاملCathoristic logic: A modal logic of incompatible propositions
Cathoristic logic is a multi-modal logic where negation is replaced by a novel operator allowing the expression of incompatible sentences. We present the syntax and semantics of the logic including complete proof rules, and establish a number of results such as compactness, a semantic characterisation of elementary equivalence, the existence of a quadratic-time decision procedure, and Brandom’s...
متن کاملthe development of per impossibile from aristotle to quṭb al-din razi
aristotle took per impossibile as a form of hypothetical syllogism which was composed of a syllogistic and a non-syllogistic part. but he didn’t express the relation between these two parts clearly. alexander of aphrodisias and philoponus didn’t add any specific comments to aristotle’s view. al-farabi believed that per impossible includes three deductions: two categorical syllogisms and one exc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Apeiron
سال: 2013
ISSN: 2156-7093,0003-6390
DOI: 10.1515/apeiron-2012-0067